RUSHWRITER-LOGO

Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your ESSAY and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Write My Essay For Me

To Prepare for the Discussion:

  • Review the Learning Resources.
  • Select one of the following topics for the Discussion:
    • Adoption
    • Foster care
    • Gender dysphoria
    • Forensic issues
    • Impact of terrorism on children

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Post:

  • Write your selected disorder in the subject line of your Discussion post.
  • Explain the psychological issues that may result from your topic.
  • Describe the most effective assessment measure that could be used, and explain why you selected this.
  • Explain the treatment options available for children and adolescents involved with your selected disorder.
  • Explain how culture may influence treatment.

Provide a minimum of three academic references. Including Introduction and Conclusion

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16727056_1&rubric_id=_1840502_1 1/4

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

“* Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) * Is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources * Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources ”

40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

“* Responds to the discussion question(s) * Is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * Supported by at least three credible references”

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

“* Responds to most of the discussion question(s) * Is somewhat re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * Supported by at least three credible references”

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

“* Responds to some of the discussion question(s) * One to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addressed * Is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis * Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * Post is cited with fewer than two credible references”

0 (0%) – 30 (30%) “* Does not respond to the discussion question(s) * Lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria * Lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis * Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module * Contains only one or no credible references”

Main Posting: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) “* Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style”

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

“* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling errors * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style”

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style”

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

“* Written somewhat concisely * May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting errors”

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) “* Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style”

Name: NRNP_6660_Week11_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

11/3/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16727056_1&rubric_id=_1840502_1 2/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Timely and full participation

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

“* Meets requirements for timely and full participation * Posts main discussion by due date”

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * Does not meet requirement for full participation

First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) “* Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * Responds to questions posed by faculty * The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives”

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* Response is on topic and may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * Response may not be on topic and lacks depth

First Response: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) “* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in standard edited English”

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

“* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in standard edited English”

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in standard edited English”

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

“* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited ”

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) “* Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited”

11/3/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16727056_1&rubric_id=_1840502_1 3/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

First Response: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Meets requirements for timely and full participation * Posts by due date”

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * Does not meet requirements for full participation

Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) “* Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * Responds to questions posed by faculty * The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives”

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* Response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

Second Response: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) “* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in standard edited English”

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

“* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in standard edited English”

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in standard edited English”

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

“* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited ”

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) “* Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited”

11/3/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16727056_1&rubric_id=_1840502_1 4/4Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Second Response: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Meets requirements for timely and full participation * Posts by due date”

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * Does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6660_Week11_Discussion_Rubric

Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

The post Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11) appeared first on BestNursingWritingServices.

I absolutely LOVE this essay writing service. This is perhaps the tenth time I am ordering from them, and they have not failed me not once! My research paper was of excellent quality, as always. You can order essays, discussion, article critique, coursework, projects, case study, term papers, research papers, reaction paper, movie review, research proposal, capstone project, speech/presentation, book report/review, annotated bibliography, and more.

STUCK with your assignments? Hire Someone to Write Your papers. 100% plagiarism-free work Guarantee!

PLACE YOUR ORDER